Men make five trips to the newborn’s house to apologize

BEIJING, Jan. 14 (Xinhua) Jan. 8, a news report “Want to Run 5 times for Newborns to Request Parent-Child Identification” was widely disseminated in the media. Yest

erday, the Public Security Bureau of Ledong Li Autonomous County, Hainan Province, announ

ced on its official micro-blog that it had criticized the police involved and transferred them from their original posts.

The briefing said that after the incident, the Party Committee of the former Ledong Frontier Defense Branch attached great i

mportance to it and led by the Branch Discipline Commission, immediately set up an investigation team to fully verify the incident. After verification, in or

der to ensure the authenticity of the household registration process, the failure to verify the household registration materials promptly led to a l

ong time of household registration processing, which caused trouble to Mr. Xing’s normal life,

and the improper speech and rough behavior of the police officer Fei Tongqing caused bad image to the public security when he received the masse

s. Ring. After studying and deciding by the Party Commit

tee of the detachment, Fei Tongqing was notified and criticized and transferred from his original post.

At present, the detachment investigation team, the leader a

nd the police officer Tong Jing have apologized to the party Mr. Xing, and have

obtained the understanding of the parties. Recently, the former Ledong Frontier Defense Branch of Public Security has launched a one-month confere

nce to regulate law enforcement and discipline style, focusing on rectifying the non-standard and

uncivilized situation in the process of law enforcement. At the same time, we thank the masses for their supervision and support.

In addition, the police also introduced about Xing Weihao’s report to the police station five times, failed to handle the situation of children settled down.

1. In mid-October 2018, Xing Weihao entrusted his brother to Huangliu Police Station to handle t

he settlement of the child. At that time, with the application form and birth certificate of the child’s birth and residenc

e, Tong Jing, the police officer in Huangdong Village, went out to police, and Liang Changdong, the police officer, accepted it at that time. When Xing Weihao’s hus

band and wife were found to have been married for more than 10 years without giving birth, they immediately informed the party that Xing

Weihao’s brother, who had not given birth for many years after marriage, needed further verification by the police, and then

Xing Weihao’s brother left the police station. Following the return of the police fee, Liang Changdo

ng, the police officer, informed Fei of the situation, and Fei began to investigate and verify it.

www.ananlfeng.com

The misjudgement of the Asian Cup has caused controversy

Australia’s team was unfavourable and lost 0-1 to Jordan. In this game, both sides were dissatisfied with the referee’s decision. Both t

eams had a handball missed by the referee in the restricted area. VAR was only introduced in the quarter-finals of the Asian Cup, but it is invisible, which

makes the previous games full of controversy. In the 2018 season, the Chinese Super League adopted VAR, and the effect was immediate, wh

ich made the misjudgement impossible to follow. By contrast, the fairness of the Asian Cup is much worse.

Handball missed in the two restricted areas! No VAR Australian Treaty War Penalty Points Full

In the contest between Australia and Jordan, the referee has been controversial a

bout the penalty. Especially the two sides were missing a restricted area handball, which also seriously affected the trend and fairness of the game.

In the 44th minute of the match, Longo took the ball to the left and Kruze’s shot hit the defensive

Hilbaya on the arm. Australian players also raised their hands to the referee to signal foul handball, but the referee ignored it. In slow motion, Hil

baya’s left arm has a distinct lifting motion, not close to the body, and changes the course of the ball, which should undoubtedly be a penalty kick.

In the second half of the game, Australia’s handball foul in the penalty area was also mi

ssed by the referee. In the 77th minute, Rahman kicked the free kick into the penalty area. When Besidge headed the ball ou

t of the penalty area, it hit his arm in the process of falling. Jordan’s players also complained to the referee, but the referee also ignored it.

It is precisely because there is no VAR relationship that both players have a handball missed i

n the penalty area. As an inter-continental competition, it is intolerable that so many controversial omissions occur.

Double standard? Host points for the same action

In the opening battle, the United Arab Emirates drew with Bahrain 1-1. When the United Arab

Emirates was on the verge of losing 1-0, Bahrain’s Mohammed Mahon fouled carelessly in the penalty area in the process of corner kick defense. At that t

ime, the referee hesitated a little, then made a penalty penalty, and eventually the United Arab Emirates will be chasing the score to 1-1.

In a controversial penalty kick in the opening game, the referee starts and makes a penalty, then turns around and decides a penalty kick.

Similar handball fouls, the United Arab Emirates will be awarded a penalty, the difficulty of whic

h is the home advantage of the United Arab Emirates? The United Arab Emirates got a penalty kick, while handball fouls in

the restricted areas of Australia and Jordan were omitted. The referee did have the suspicion of double marks in the penalty scale.

www.nj419snlt.com

The spirit of Mrs. Chia Shih-yin departs from the town

The spirit of Mrs. Chia Shih-yin departs from the town of Yang Chou — Leng Tzu-hsing dilates upon the Jung Kuo Mansion.

亚博娱乐游戏yb亚博体育APPyb亚博体育APPTo continue. Feng Su, upon hearing the shouts of the public messengers, came out in a flurry and forcing a smile, he asked them to explain (their errand); but all these people did was to continue bawling out: “Be quick, and ask Mr. Chen to come out.”

“My surname is Feng,” said Feng Su, as he promptly forced himself to smile; “It is’nt Chen at all: I had once a son-in-law whose surname was Chen, but he has left home, it is now already a year or two back. Is it perchance about him that you are inquiring?”

To which the public servants remarked: “We know nothing about Chen or Chia (true or false); but as he is your son-in-law, we’ll take you at once along with us to make verbal answer to our master and have done with it.”

And forthwith the whole bevy of public servants hustled Feng Su on, as they went on their way back; while every one in the Feng family was seized with consternation, and could not imagine what it was all about.

It was no earlier than the second watch, when Feng Su returned home; and they, one and all, pressed him with questions as to what had happened.

“The fact is,” he explained, “the newly-appointed Magistrate, whose surname is Chia, whose name is Huo and who is a native of Hu-chow, has been on intimate terms, in years gone by, with our son-in-law; that at the sight of the girl Chiao Hsing, standing at the door, in the act of buying thread, he concluded that he must have shifted his quarters over here, and hence it was that his messengers came to fetch him. I gave him a clear account of the various circumstances (of his misfortunes), and the Magistrate was for a time much distressed and expressed his regret. He then went on to make inquiries about my grand-daughter, and I explained that she had been lost, while looking at the illuminations. ‘No matter,’ put in the Magistrate,

‘I will by and by order my men to make search,

and I feel certain that they will find her and bring her back.’

Then ensued a short conversation,

after which I was about to go,

when he presented me with the sum of two taels.”

www.shl419.com